Political Science

[ undergraduate program | courses | faculty ]

Social Science Building
http://polisci.ucsd.edu

All courses, faculty listings, and curricular and degree requirements described herein are subject to change or deletion without notice.

The PhD Program

The Department of Political Science at the University of California San Diego offers a program of graduate studies leading to the PhD degree. Instruction is provided in the major fields of the discipline. For purposes of comprehensive examinations, the discipline is broken into five fields: American politics, comparative politics, international relations, political theory, and methodology. The department also offers a variety of courses that are of a methodological or epistemological nature, spanning the various fields.

Program Overview

Course Work

Students must complete eighteen quarter courses before the end of the second year with an overall grade point average of 3.3 or better. All students must complete the four-course core curriculum, POLI 203A-B and 204A-B. No other UC San Diego courses may be substituted to fulfill this requirement. Fifteen of these courses must be offered by the department, with a number between POLI 200 and 279. (POLI 203A-B and 204A-B count toward this requirement). No more than three courses of the eighteen quarter courses, offered within or outside the department, may be taken on a satisfactory/unsatisfactory basis. In some individual fields the faculty normally recommends that students take more graded courses in political science than the minimum.

Additional requirements, such as course work or research skills including proficiency in a foreign language, may be set by the faculty in any examination area as a prerequisite for taking the general examination in that area.

A student who has completed work toward a graduate degree in political science at another institution prior to enrollment at UC San Diego is subject to all requirements of the UC San Diego program. The only exception is as follows: With permission of the department’s director of Graduate Studies, a student that has received a graduate degree in political science at another institution may count up to four quarter-course equivalents (taken at other institutions) toward the eighteen-course requirement, including the core curriculum.

Good progress toward the PhD requires that a student complete nine courses by the end of the first year. In addition to the four-course core curriculum, students are advised to complete two or three field core courses during their first year. At the end of the second year good progress requires completion of eighteen courses, of which at least fifteen must be numbered between POLI 200 and 279.

A student who has not made good progress in course work may receive no more than a 33 percent teaching or research assistantship from the department for the following year. Students on a UC San Diego fellowship may receive no more than two-thirds of their stipend for the following year.

Field Requirements

For students entering the program fall 2021 and later.

	Core Course Requirements	Other Required Courses
American Politics	251. American Political Institutions AND 252. American Politics: Behavior OR 257. Voting and Elections
Comparative Politics	220B. Comparative Politics: Institutions AND 220A. Comparative Politics: State and Society
International Relations	240. International Relations Theory	Three graduate seminars numbered POLI 232, 236–248 GPS courses: with prior written approval of the IR field coordinator, students may take GPS courses that (1) have sufficient international content and (2) incorporate additional requirements for PhD students.
Political Methodology	270. Mathematical and Statistical Foundations 271. Advanced Statistical Applications 273. Causal Inference	Two graduate seminars from the POLI 260, 263, or 270–279 range, such as 260. Social Science Replication 263. Theory and Analysis/Experiments 276. Qualitative Methods 277. Measurement Theory 279. T/Social Network Analysis 279. T/Graphical Models and Statistical Learning 287. Multidisciplinary Methods in Political Science: Social Networks 288. Multidisciplinary Methods in Political Science: Computational Social Science 289. Multidisciplinary Methods in Political Science: Biology
Political Theory	FOUR courses numbered 210–219

General Examination

Students must stand for the qualifying examination by the end of their second year. The department offers exams in five fields—American politics, comparative politics, international relations, methodology, and political theory. Students pick two exam fields and are expected to have completed their field requirements before taking the qualifier. The exam is written and has two components:

Research Paper: Students must demonstrate depth of knowledge of the chosen field and ability to do original research.
- The research paper is on a topic of the student’s choosing.
- The paper must be solo-authored.
- The length cannot exceed 10,000 words, including abstract and references, but excluding appendices.
- The research may draw upon work originally submitted for courses.
- The scope, ambition, and format of the paper must conform to the norms of the discipline, as exemplified by articles in its leading journals.
- The research paper should conform to current academic standards with respect to transparency, replicability, and ethics.

Review Paper: Students must demonstrate breadth of knowledge by engaging with the literature across at least two subfields, synthesizing existing research, identifying knowledge gaps in current debates, and gesturing toward avenues for research that could potentially fill these gaps.
- Students must select at least three debates in political science, critically assess the state of current knowledge about them, and bring them together to address an enduring major topic in the field.
- The paper must be solo-authored.
- The integration of the two chosen subfields can occur within these debates or across them.
- The length cannot exceed 8,000 words, including abstract and references, but excluding appendices.
- While students are encouraged to engage in debates that are relevant to their research agenda, the content of the review paper must not overlap with the literature review section included in the research paper.

Deadlines

Student’s First Year

Friday of the ninth week of spring quarter: Students choose one faculty adviser (second-year adviser) to supervise their review paper and research paper. The second-year adviser signs a form in which they agree to supervise the two papers for the qualifier, which is submitted to the graduate coordinator. This adviser may be the same as the first-year adviser initially assigned to the student, and this adviser may go on to supervise the student’s dissertation.

Student’s Second Year

Friday of the second week of the fall quarter: The second-year adviser must approve in writing a rough outline of topics to be covered in the review paper (including an initial reading list), which the student submits to the graduate coordinator. Students should discuss an appropriate timeline for sending their work to their adviser, but must plan on submitting the materials to them at least two weeks in advance of this deadline. When preparing their initial reading list, students should anticipate that the review paper will be assessed by faculty from their first and second subfield. Accordingly, they should seek guidance from faculty in both subfields when crafting the reading list. The reading list is just a starting point; students are expected to revise and expand their list as they develop their review paper.
Winter quarter: The student is encouraged to present a draft of the research paper in their subfield workshop.
Spring quarter: The student must present a draft of the research paper in the integrated workshop. Students are encouraged to contact faculty whose attendance they wish to ensure at least two weeks in advance of their scheduled presentation
Friday of the first full week of spring quarter. The student submits, in electronic form, rough drafts of both qualifier papers to the graduate coordinator with the second-year adviser carbon copied. Failure to submit rough drafts of the papers by this deadline will automatically disqualify the student from taking the qualifying examination, which implies leaving the program.
Friday of the fifth week of spring quarter: The student submits in electronic form penultimate drafts of the papers to the second-year adviser.
Friday of the sixth week of spring quarter: The student submits, via turnitin.com, the final drafts of the papers. The second-year adviser signs a form, submitted to the graduate coordinator, certifying that they have read the papers and that the papers represent substantially the work of the student. Failure to submit the final drafts of the papers by this deadline will automatically disqualify the student from taking the qualifying examination, which implies leaving the program.

Grading

Each of the fields, in which qualifying examinations are administered, must have a designated field coordinator (FC), who is appointed by the department chair in consultation with the director of Graduate Studies (DGS). The FC nominates examiners, who are then appointed by the department chair.
Exam committees have three readers—two in the first field and one in the second. Whenever possible, the research paper and review paper should be graded by a different committee. Students are informed about the composition of exam committees during the fourth week of spring quarter.
Grading is single-blind (student’s name is redacted) and can result in either Pass or Fail. It is based on the common published assessment criteria developed by the department. Committees are strongly encouraged to provide comments in writing.
Members of the exam committees meet with each other if, and only if, at least one reader has rated the paper as Fail. If this meeting results in a collective rating of Fail, the student can revise and resubmit the paper before September 1 of the same year. The student may request a meeting with the committee to receive guidance for revisions. The revised version is graded by the same committee using the same procedure as in the initial assessment.
Each paper is graded separately. The student must pass both papers to continue in the program.
Students who have not attempted all parts of the qualifying examination by the end of their second year may not continue in the program unless they have an advance exception under department rules.

Seminar Papers

A student must complete one seminar paper in one of his or her examination fields. This paper may be written as part of the requirements for a regularly scheduled seminar course or in an independent research course.

Guidelines for the Seminar Paper

Acceptable article length for most journals is eight thousand to ten thousand words and seminar papers should be a similar length.
The basic structure of the article should include
- An introduction framing the significance of the question, sketching the answer, and (where subfield appropriate) delineating the research design and empirical findings
- A comprehensive yet succinct literature review placing the research in the context of prior work on the subject
- A discussion of research design (where subfield appropriate)
- Appropriate empirical analysis (where subfield appropriate)
- A conclusion highlighting the contributions of the research and returning to general questions
- Papers must be solo authored.
Examples of recent published articles written by UC San Diego graduate students will be available to students upon request.

Papers may draw from papers originally written for courses. However, it is generally the case that course papers will need substantial revision before becoming suitable seminar papers. Students may write papers in fields other than their first or second exam fields.

Students must identify an adviser for the seminar paper. Seminar paper advisers may be the first-year adviser but are not required to be. Seminar paper advisers may go on to supervise dissertations but are not required to do so. Advisers must agree (certified in writing, to the graduate program coordinator) to serve this purpose by 4:00 p.m. on Friday of the eighth week of fall quarter. Penalties for failing to identify an adviser by this due date are at the discretion of the director of Graduate Studies. Students are advised to contact the director of Graduate Studies or their field coordinator if they are having difficulty identifying an adviser.

Students must submit a rough draft of the seminar paper (in hard copy and electronic form) to the graduate program coordinator by 4:00 p.m. on Friday of the first full week of spring quarter. The graduate program coordinator is responsible for ensuring that a copy of the paper is provided to the seminar paper adviser. Students failing to submit a draft of the paper by this deadline will not be permitted to take the comprehensive exam in the spring quarter. Please note that this implies leaving the program.

Students should submit a penultimate draft of the paper to the seminar paper adviser one week prior to the final draft due date. Students must submit a final draft of the seminar paper (in hard copy and electronic form) to the graduate program coordinator by 4:00 p.m. on Monday of the week prior to the written exams. Students failing to submit a final draft of the paper by this deadline will not be permitted to take the comprehensive exam in the spring quarter. Please note that this implies leaving the program.

Departmental Workshops

During the third year, a student must be enrolled in a departmental workshop (course numbers 280–289). Departmental workshops are intended to introduce students to advanced research in political science and to facilitate the completion of the doctoral dissertation. Workshops typically meet on a biweekly basis and include discussion of common readings, public talks, and student presentations. Each field is responsible for maintaining or identifying a workshop for students writing a dissertation in that field.

During the third year, each student is required to present a draft dissertation prospectus or an original piece of research to a workshop at least once. A form indicating completion of this requirement must be submitted to the graduate coordinator by the end of the third year.

By October 15 of the third year, each student must identify a prospectus adviser and the tentative topic of the prospectus. Each student is responsible for submitting the appropriate form, indicating the adviser’s name, to the graduate coordinator.

PhD in Political Science with a Specialization in Computational Social Science

Computational Social Science (CSS) integrates large-scale data analysis with formal, causal models from social science domains, to not only improve predictions but also guide extrapolation and intervention beyond existing data. Students pursuing the specialization will find a clear path to accessing training in computational social science, a formal mechanism for recognizing their efforts, and access to a broad network of relevant scholars.

Eligibility

The graduate specialization in computational social science is only available to students currently enrolled in a PhD program at UC San Diego in the following School of Social Sciences departments: anthropology, communication, cognitive science, economics, education studies, ethnic studies, linguistics, political science, psychology, and sociology. Doctoral students in these departments may apply for the specialization through the CSS administration, housed in the Department of Psychology, with the endorsement of the student’s primary research adviser and department chair. Students are eligible to join the CSS specialization at any time pre-candidacy; post-candidacy requests are reviewed on a case-by-case basis and may require additional justification relating to time to degree.

Requirements

In addition to the PhD requirements of their home department, admitted students are required to complete the following requirements:

Three quarters of CSS 209. Computational Social Science Research Seminar.
Three courses from a list of electives, at least one of which must not count toward the home department PhD requirements, with at least one of these electives drawn from the subset of “advanced data” courses.
Appointment to the dissertation committee of at least one CSS affiliated faculty member not affiliated with the student’s home department.
Satisfactory completion of a dissertation including a technical and/or computational social science component.

PhD in Political Science and International Affairs with a Specialization in Environmental Research

A graduate specialization in Interdisciplinary Environmental Research (PIER) is available for select doctoral students in political science. PIER students seek solutions to today’s environmental challenges.

The PhD specialization is designed to allow students to obtain standard training in their chosen field and an opportunity to interact with peers in different disciplines throughout the duration of their doctoral projects. Such communication across disciplines is key to fostering a capacity for interdisciplinary “language” skills and conceptual flexibility.

Specialization Requirements

Complete all course work, dissertation, and other requirements of the doctorate in political science
Sixteen-unit interdisciplinary boot camp (summer, SIO 295S–295LS)
Eight units from a secondary field (outside the home department)
Six units (three quarters) Interdisciplinary Environmental Research Forum (SIO 296)
At least one chapter of the dissertation will be broadly related to environmental research and will be interdisciplinary in nature.

Application Requirements

We advise students to begin PIER in their third year upon completion of core political science course requirements.

The following items should be combined into a single PDF document and submitted to cmbc@ucsd.edu.

Student’s CV
Half-page abstract of proposed thesis work
Up to one-page statement of student’s interest in interdisciplinary environmental research including career goals.
Nomination letter from adviser acknowledging student’s academic ability and interdisciplinary environmental interest. The letter must include a commitment for summer stipend support.

Admission to the Specialization

Students are admitted into the political science doctoral program. Admission to PIER is a competitive process with six to eight students granted admission each year from across ten participating UC San Diego departments. Selected applicants will have the opportunity to enroll in the specialization.

PIER Fellowships

When funding is available, all applicants will be considered for one year of PIER Fellowship support.

PhD in Political Science and International Affairs with a Specialization in Computational Social Science

Eligibility

Requirements

In addition to the PhD requirements of their home department, admitted students are required to complete the following requirements:

Three quarters of CSS 209. Computational Social Science Research Seminar.
Three courses from a list of electives, at least one of which must not count toward the home department PhD requirements, with at least one of these electives drawn from the subset of “advanced data” courses.
Appointment to the dissertation committee of at least one CSS affiliated faculty member not affiliated with the student’s home department.
Satisfactory completion of a dissertation including a technical and/or computational social science component.

Master’s Degree in Political Science

Doctoral students in the Department of Political Science may apply for an MA after successfully completing fifteen quarter courses, nine of which must be taken for a letter grade and numbered between POLI 200 and 279, and one seminar paper approved by a member of the department. Any current doctoral student who holds an MA or MS and has completed or will complete the requirements for a second master’s degree during his or her course of progress to the doctorate may apply to receive the MA with the consent of the department. However, the second degree must be in a different field than the first.

Advancement to Candidacy (Master's)

Certification that a paper fulfills the seminar paper requirement is at the sole discretion of the faculty member supervising the work (i.e., the instructor of the course for which the paper was written).

A student may not take the general examination before fulfilling the seminar paper requirement. A final draft of the paper, along with the appropriate form certifying that the paper meets the seminar paper requirement, must be submitted to the graduate coordinator before the written portion of the general examination may be taken. Copies of the seminar paper will be distributed to the general examination committee.

Advancement to Candidacy (Doctoral)

In order to advance to candidacy, a student must prepare a dissertation prospectus and pass an oral examination with a committee that meets campus guidelines (please contact the graduate program coordinator for committee formation guidelines or refer to the department website). Committee member names and roles must be submitted to the graduate program coordinator no later than two weeks before the anticipated prospectus defense.

By the end of spring quarter of the second year, each student must submit a form to the graduate coordinator identifying a faculty member as third-year prospectus adviser. By October 15 of the third year, each student must submit to the graduate coordinator a form identifying a tentative topic of the prospectus.

Once the committee has been submitted and approved and the defense has taken place, the student or a committee member must communicate the results of the defense to the graduate coordinator. The graduate coordinator will then initiate a DocuSign form that will be routed to all committee members, the student, and the department chair before being routed to the Division of Graduate Education and Postdoctoral Affairs. Once complete, the student must pay a $50 candidacy fee either online on their student account or at the UC San Diego Cashier’s Office.

Good progress toward the PhD requires that students advance to candidacy by end of the fall quarter of the fourth year. A student who fails to advance to candidacy by the end of the fall quarter of the fourth year may receive no more than a 33 percent teaching or research assistantship from the department for the following quarters until advancing to candidacy. Students who have received guaranteed funding may receive no more than two-thirds of their stipend for the subsequent quarters until advancing to candidacy.

A student who fails to advance to candidacy by the end of the summer of their fourth year will not be permitted to continue in the graduate program in political science.

Dissertation

By the end of the sixth year, good progress requires completion of the dissertation. A student who fails to complete the dissertation by the end of the sixth year may be denied all departmental financial assistance.

Advising and Evaluation

Each incoming student is assigned a temporary faculty adviser by the director of Graduate Studies. At the end of the first year, students are given the opportunity to confirm that adviser or select a new one. At the beginning of the third year each student must select a faculty member from the department to serve as prospectus adviser. The prospectus adviser will help guide the student in writing the prospectus and selecting a dissertation committee. It is not assumed that the prospectus adviser will subsequently chair the dissertation committee, or even be a member of it. Those roles should be determined as the prospectus develops.

During the spring quarter each student is evaluated by his or her adviser in consultation with the departmental faculty. The student will receive a written evaluation from the adviser each year. The student must sign this evaluation for it to become an official part of the student’s departmental file. As part of the first-year review each student must complete a plan of study that identifies a faculty seminar paper supervisor, two examination fields, a focus area, and intended preparation in each. This plan must be signed by the student’s faculty adviser and submitted to the graduate coordinator by the end of spring quarter of the first year.

Student Petitions

To contest an evaluation or any departmental action a student must do so in writing. A petition should be submitted to the director of Graduate Studies no later than the end of the quarter following the evaluation (or other action) contested by the student.